Special 'economic' or 'political ' zones?

Ishita Russell

The game of politics has threatened to bowl out development yet again. With the crucial Uttar Pradesh and Punjab elections round the corner, Special Economic Zones (SEZ) policy faces the brunt of political propaganda. Without in-depth analysis, the political parties singing the 'aam aadmi' tune with the blatant call of stopping the SEZs.

It is interesting to see that despite the strong opposition from major political parties, none of them are disowning the policy. After all, they do not want to miss out on their share of the pie if the SEZ policy is a success. With issues like the Singur land acquisition being mixed into the SEZ debate, analyst BG Verghese has rightly termed development in India a 'political khichdi'.

With allegations of faulty acquisitions of land, mass displacement of farmers and as the JDU calls the policy a play in the hands of corporate land grabbers, the SEZ policy has been labeled as the devil's work. The future investments of over 60,000 crore and employment generation of 9 lakh, estimated in the next two years, seems to have been conveniently overlooked.

With a broad generalisation in the issue, the government's indecisiveness has stalled the work of several non-controversial SEZs. Brandix Apparel SEZ in Vishakapatnam, Foxconn SEZ in Tamil Nadu, TATA Gopalpur multi-product SEZ and Bharat Forge SEZ near Pune are just a few of the SEZs which are put on hold. The irony lies in the fact that besides millions of dollars in investment, lakhs of employment opportunities and most importantly no land acquisition problems, the machines of these companies are yet to warm up.

Undeniably certain genuine concerns need immediate reddressal, for proper implementation process to take place. A proper rehabilitation needs to be formulated to avoid another Kalinga Nagar backlash. Such a policy is also necessary to check the insecurity of the investors.

Adequate and suitable compensation for the acquired land is the key to silence the opposition. Thus, a few modifications are required. However, the political antics should be curbed to realise the SEZ dream successfully, just as China, America and South Korea did.

Though SEZs are not the sole solution to the problems of Development in India, however they could have a major contribution. The SEZ policy is currently facing the pangs of labour, however, with a proper delivery; it could grow into a beautiful child.

 
'Brown cookie' takes the cake… Shilpa Shetty wins Big Brother
Ishita Russell
It took one person's comments to unite Indians the world over. Jade Goody's remarks just came as a rude reminder of the racism prevalent in the society. There was a huge uproar, votes poured in, diplomats got involved. Final result: Shilpa Shetty emerged as the winner of 100, 000 Pound. The Indians rejoiced at their victory and went back into their slumber of ignorance.

In a society awe-struck by stardom, such a response was hardly surprising. Rationality takes a backseat in such a situation. The possibility of a publicity stunt or a gimmick to increase the TRP ratings of the show just doesn't seem to cut through the curtain of the 'Bollywood fascination'. A few racial slurs got all mouths talking.

People who had not even heard of the show prior to the incident were glued to the television, the Indian Cabinet discussed it and the British PM-in-waiting Gordon Brown, was made answerable for it. It is astounding that a TV show could actually be responsible for almost causing a diplomatic accident or even undermining international trade talks.

After the hue and cry, when the world got worked up over Shilpa Shetty's tears, getting two ministers even to urge action against the alleged racism, the government extended Goody an invitation to visit India to experience the country's `healing nature'.

Indians are willing to forgive a foreigner for racism but not one of their own, when a Dalit enters a so called high caste temple. When our western counterparts are more welcomed into our shops than we are, the problem does not lie within the UK or US. We are blind victims of racism who refuse to realise that only if we get over our complexes and know that the brown skin can be superior to the fair, can we rise above shedding tears over on man; or in this case one woman's comments.

 

 
Social networking and its vagaries
Mihir Mishra
The growth in the number of Internet users heralded the reign of social networking portal. These portals gave a feel of real chatting in the virtual world of Internet. In this globalised and busy life, people opted to bridge the distance between them and their near and dear ones. There are social networking sites like orkut.com, zaapaz.com, friends4u.com and many more. Most sought after site is orkut.com.

This site completed three years of its existence recently. This portal is owned by the famous search portal google.com. Joining this is very simple. This simple process makes it very much vulnerable and lot many cases of fake profile and contentious community has been noticed.

One of the latest cases of faking profile was reported in Delhi when an airhostess lodged a complaint. She found her obscene profile on Orkut made by some unidentified net users. In the profile she had been described as a 'sex struck woman'. Phone number in her profile was of her neighbour, who was receiving obscene calls for some time. Her profile was also completed with communities of airhostesses and multi-national companies in order to make sure that her friends and colleagues notice her. This clearly indicates that this was done to defame her. The family of the hostess informed Orkut and they closed the profile. It was reopened after two days.

There were demands to ban this social networking site many a times. The protest against this site was because of the communities like 'I hate Narendra Modi', 'I hate Shivaji', 'I hate India' and many more, which hurt the sentiments of the people. Lot many times, after these kinds of communities surfaced there has been demands to close down this networking portal.

Banning this portal is not the solution to the problem. How many sites of this kind will be banned and can we ban the whole Internet? Though we have a stringent IT act but that too has its limitations. This act is valid only in India and a person of foreign origin if found guilty can only be punished if we have an extradition treaty with the concerned country.

A global body, which cannot be constrained by nations' boundaries, will be an ultimate solution to this brewing problem. Until and unless, there is a universal body to check all this, defaulters will roam unchecked. Data and facts on the Internet will be morphed and faked.

Its high time, precise universal laws should be thought of and worked upon to get a safe future for Internet.
 
The Neo-Sarkar of Bollywood on the Rise
Arunima Mishra
It is rightly said: 'Talent will do that what it can, genius has to do what it must'. Yes, he is a genius. He has finally proved himself. He is loved, adored and appreciated as the coolest 'hot guy' of Bollywood. He brought back the rough masculine look. It took him almost five years to metamorphose into a versatile actor. The factor 'acting' which must be in his genes shows him working with the best and brightest genres of Indian Cinema.

Abhishek clicked in Mani Ratnam's Yuva (2004). His performance as 'Lallan', the angry hit man in Yuva, was the turning point. From then onwards, he has not looked back. Again the same director's Guru (2007) has given him the best ever critical acclaim.

Gurubhai seems to be the actor most likely to lead Generation Next. So hectic has 2005 been with 17 flops, with back- to- back successes in `Bunty Aur Babli', 'Sarkar' and 'Dus' that he had to refuge- regretfully, a key role in Meera Nair' s 'The Namesake'.

The `Bluffmaster' rocked the theatres with singing as well as dancing 'Ek Main Aur Ek Tu Hai...'. According to many filmmakers, his timing also appears to be perfect. Abhishek has shown he can act and dance (evident in Kajra re… and Dus Bahane…) He matched Amitabh Bachhan's footsteps admirably in Kajra Re…. When AB Junior waves his hands in Guru as Subhash Nagre did in 'Sarkar', the audience wishes that he has the potential to rule the industry as the new 'Sarkar' (the climax of Sarkar suggests). His silence spoke volumes in the movie.

The rise of AB Junior proves that a family name helps only for a short time span and to reach the peak one should have aptitude. Refugee, AB's debut film was also appreciated as a story of pure love and emotion. However, it is a belated recognition of Abhishek's talent. Unfortunately, Indian audience prefers mindless candifloss cinema like `Dhoom' and `Dus' to sensible cinema like `Refugee', `Phir Milenge'.

Filmmakers are fixing appointment with him as he is the new Box- Office Darling. AB's strength is that 'he is real'. Never is he defensive about his critics. The key to Abhishek's long term success - he is less a star and more the character. He has grown with time. He is now worth 2.5 crore, up from Rs. 1.5 crore. His fans believe he is perfect blend of a well-brought-up boy and a classic man. Under his belt AB Junior has Shaad Ali's `Jhoom Barabar Jhoom', Pradeep Sarkar's `Chudiyan', Apoorva Lakhia's `Shootout At Lokhandwala', Ram Gopal Verma's `Sarkar 2' and Goldie Behl's `Drona'.

The wedding bells are knocking at AB Baby's door. The reel-life romance of Rani Mukherji- Abhishek even sparked off rumours of real- life romance. However, the queen bee here is the former Miss World Aishwarya Rai. Abhishek and his fiancée Aishwarya (popularly known as Abhiash) met on the sets of `Dhai Akshar Prem Ke'. The film did not click at the Box- Office and so did their next film together, `Kuch Na Kaho'. But they warmed to each other. It is Guru, which hit the box- office.

1 2 3

 


Copyright © 2006 Development Media Group. All rights reserved.
Editor: Sulochana Das